Holding the Carrot and the Stick: When Individual Therapy Isn’t Enough

Years ago, I was referred a 15-year-old because of my willingness to work with high-conflict families. The family had spent more than a decade working with mental health professionals, and his behaviour had become so explosive that no one involved was willing to meet with the son and his parents together.

From the outset, it was clear that escalation worked. He had been born two months premature, and his mother had lived with the fear of losing him. That sense of his fragility was still present in their relationship. When he became highly distressed, she would soothe, accommodate, or back away from limits. His father was more authoritarian, and a psychologist had advised the father and son to avoid each other, which had increasingly pushed him out of the picture.

My work required me to hold two goals at the same time. I had to help the parents change what was happening around the behaviour. His mother had to stop rescuing him from the distress that followed limits, his father had to regain a legitimate parental role, and both parents had to learn to set and hold limits through the inevitable behavioural escalation. His escalation had to stop working.

At the same time, I had to maintain a strong enough relationship with him to help him understand why those limits were necessary, and help him learn to tolerate the feelings that came with them: disappointment, anger, grief, and fear of abandonment.

The therapist has to manage both carrots and sticks. Individual therapy can be insufficient when the environment is reinforcing the behaviour. Working with an adolescent in a family means working with both: helping the family change what reinforces the behaviour and set and hold limits, while helping the young person understand, tolerate, and eventually respect those limits.

The cycle repeated almost daily: the kid would blow up, his father would become angry and threaten to kick him out of the house, and his mother would move in to soothe him, intensifying the conflict between his parents. His siblings resented both him and their parents as so much of the family’s attention and energy became organized around his crises.

The change in this kid was profound. His relationship with both parents improved dramatically, and he went on to do well at school, in a summer job, and later in college. More importantly, he had developed a different understanding of relationships. He learned that frustration has to be tolerated, entitlement has to be examined, reciprocity matters, and other people are allowed to have boundaries.

He came to understand that if you want something from someone, they have to want to give it to you.

In one of my last conversations with him, we were talking about what had changed that made it so much easier for him to accept no without escalating. His answer captured the shift perfectly:

“I’m not entitled to their yes.”

That is the change I am looking for.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

More Posts

The Game of Life

We are all playing the game of life, but the rules that shape our behaviour are not always fixed. How do competition, cooperation, culture, and power influence the way we live? And what happens when we decide to change the rules?

When Consent Begins with a No

When a young person refuses therapy, the answer shouldn’t automatically be that nothing can be done. Consent is not always a starting point; sometimes it is something that develops through trust, understanding, and meaningful connection. Drawing on decades of clinical experience, this article explores how therapists can move beyond a simple yes-or-no understanding of consent and help young people become willing participants in their own change.

The Problem with Belonging

Human beings need to belong, but belonging can become dangerous when it demands loyalty at the expense of compassion, independent thought, or connection with others. From family conflict and parental alienation to online communities and global tribalism, this article explores how the need to belong can turn into exclusion and hatred—and why we need forms of belonging that unite us without requiring us to dehumanize anyone else.

The Problem with Maggie

What can a little dog named Maggie teach us about psychotherapy? Through her reactions to anger, vulnerability, and perceived danger, this article explores the importance of looking beneath defensive behaviour. Drawing on decades of clinical experience, it examines how therapists can remain compassionate and steady when clients become angry or resistant, recognizing that the bark is not the whole story.