Why Do We Destroy Our Idols?

We destroy our idols by refusing to let them have boundaries.

At the beginning, there is admiration. Talent, presence, something that moves us.

As that admiration grows, the person becomes a role.

They are no longer someone who sings. They become the singer.

I was only 10 years old when a 10-year-old Michael Jackson emerged into the world. He blew my mind—the music, the movement, the presence. I idolized him.

Over the years, as I followed his career, it became increasingly difficult to witness what was unfolding in the life of the man behind the music. The music remained extraordinary. What surrounded it was harder to make sense of.

I’ve felt that same admiration for many musicians. Their music has brought great joy and meaning to my life. I would never approach them in public or insert myself into their lives unless it was clearly invited—a setting where they are open to being approached.

Once someone is reduced to a role, boundaries begin to collapse.

Access is expected. Availability is assumed. Their life becomes something others feel entitled to.

There is no clear line between the performer and the person.

Stories about him arranging private shopping experiences just to move through a store like an ordinary person show the extent someone has to go to in order to create even the most basic boundary.

That kind of pressure doesn’t leave a person unchanged.

When there is no protected space to step out of the role, the role expands.

It takes over more and more of the person’s life.

We don’t destroy our idols in a single moment.

We do it by turning admiration into 24-7 access, access into expectation, and expectation into entitlement.

And in that process, the “man in the mirror” is overtaken by the version everyone else needs them to be.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

More Posts

The Game of Life

We are all playing the game of life, but the rules that shape our behaviour are not always fixed. How do competition, cooperation, culture, and power influence the way we live? And what happens when we decide to change the rules?

When Consent Begins with a No

When a young person refuses therapy, the answer shouldn’t automatically be that nothing can be done. Consent is not always a starting point; sometimes it is something that develops through trust, understanding, and meaningful connection. Drawing on decades of clinical experience, this article explores how therapists can move beyond a simple yes-or-no understanding of consent and help young people become willing participants in their own change.

The Problem with Belonging

Human beings need to belong, but belonging can become dangerous when it demands loyalty at the expense of compassion, independent thought, or connection with others. From family conflict and parental alienation to online communities and global tribalism, this article explores how the need to belong can turn into exclusion and hatred—and why we need forms of belonging that unite us without requiring us to dehumanize anyone else.

Holding the Carrot and the Stick: When Individual Therapy Isn’t Enough

How do you help a teenager whose explosive behaviour has taken over family life? Through a challenging family case, this article explores the importance of changing the patterns that reinforce behaviour while helping young people develop accountability, emotional tolerance, and respect for boundaries. At the heart of meaningful change is a powerful realization: “I’m not entitled to their yes.”